Monday, December 6, 2010

Internet Policing



Think about it: Where is this seemingly staged WikiLeaks taking us?  While we participate in digging into the juicy tidbits of information that incriminate just about everybody, where is it all going?

While 9/11 served as a wake-up call to those awake, and aware enough to see the obvious demolitions and misinformation and the resultant “Pearl Harbour” effect.  Most of the world fell for it.  As a result, people are literally bending over at our airports, (thanks TSA).  It’s staggering.  In fact, it’s ORWELLIAN.  The armies, police and the private sector are at war with the vague concept of terrorism – an unbeatable enemy in a war that can, and will be drawn out indefinitely, and fought in any arena necessary.  How long have we been fighting the ‘war on drugs'?  Since the early 1970’s, I think.

What was the result of this declared war on terrorism?  Not a war on terror, but an increase in fear and terror.  All to justify the economic, social, and political clampdown that’s followed.





WHAT WILL THE END RESULT OF THIS WIKILEAKS DEBACLE BE?

You guessed it – The last bastion of freedom of information and expression.  A FREE INTERNET will topple. After all, if information is now the enemy, we must carefully police any and all aspects of this very dangerous medium.  That’s all for the safety and protection of “We the people”.
Oh believe me; we’ll still have the Internet, just like you can still fly.  But, you’ll have to be on an ‘approved’ list.  You’ll be screened, stamped, zapped, mugged and molested if you want to get Online.  No big deal.  We’ve been having this done for years now.  Since September, 2001.

WHAT ARE THE WARNING SIGNS?

#1 – WikiLeaks – This site was WAAAY too approved and publicized.  Every TV and cable network, press worldwide and official recognition from every level of government.  Where’s anyone else who’s trying to expose the agenda?  Only WikiLeaks. Odd?

#2 – WikiLeaks and Assange’s Sketchy Background – The WIkiLeaks website first appeared on the Internet in December 2006.  The site claims to have been founded by Chinese dissidents, journalists, mathematicians, and start-up company technologists, from the US, Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa.  THE CREATORS OF WIKILEAKS HAVE NOT BEEN FORMALLY IDENTIFIED.  It has been represented in the public since January 2007 by Julian Assange, and others.  Assange describes himself as a member of WikiLeaks’ Advisory Board.
ALSO: Assange reportedly wrote for both the New York Times and the Economist, which I find rather fishy as well – not a real enlightened or ‘alternative’ mindset.  His mysterious persona also plays well to the WikiLeaks furtive image so people won’t expect to know too much, which is also very convenient for keeping anything HIDDEN.

#3 – Watch The Hype:  There’s a growing crescendo of anger and hate that is now being whipped up.  To the point that Assange is now being called a NEW KIND OF TERRORIST – and more disturbingly, and as expected, the comparison is now being drawn between Assange, and Bin Laden.




KNOW YOUR ENEMY
First, there’s the HEGELIAN DIALECTIC – Create a problem, provoke a reaction, and then implement the pre-planned solution.  The staged 9/11 attacks, including the internationally inhibited World Trade Center JUSTIFIED the ensuing wars, and worldwide clampdown on freedoms in the name of ‘security’.  This includes the Patriot Act, which I assume had already been written, and just waiting for the right excuse to be signed into law.

With surprising similarities, this attack over the INTERNATIONAL Internet, and drawing in diplomatic communities worldwide, by exposing state secrets from a variety of different countries will greatly help usher in international measures in the name of ‘security’, probably spearheaded by the fascist American Government. It's already underway, with the Department of Homeland Security shutting down many websites.
Remember, all they need is the ‘right’ incident to justify bringing on FULL CONTROL.  “Internet Terrorism” sounds to me like the PERFECT incident.

No comments:

Post a Comment